FUKKUDA's candle lighter replaces butane with a USB-charged battery and a dual plasma arc across ceramic contacts at the end of a slim, 7.8 inch aluminum body. It lights candles easily and never needs refilling. The real question is how long a given unit keeps doing that.
Lighting a candle with this FUKKUDA takes one press and no fuel, and that part is easy to love: a dual plasma arc, a safety switch that guards the ignition button and a 7-second auto-off make it simple to use. The worry is lifespan. Charging and durability draw more complaints than praise, with some units dying within weeks or a few months, so treat it as an inexpensive convenience rather than a lifetime tool.
NoFussDeal rates the FUKKUDA Electric Candle Lighter 4.1 out of 5 at $7.99. Last updated October 4, 2026.
Two arcs jump between alumina ceramic contacts at the tip, giving a wider hot zone than a single arc. There is no flame, so it works in wind, produces no smoke or odor and never needs butane. The arc lights a wick on contact rather than from a distance.
The ignition button sits under a safety switch, a double-lock that stops it firing by accident in a pocket, bag or drawer. The arc also switches itself off after 7 seconds. FUKKUDA warns never to touch the arc, and the buzzing sound during ignition is normal.
A built-in lithium-ion battery recharges over USB from a computer, power bank or adapter, and power indicator lights show the remaining charge. Battery life splits opinion, and charging is the most criticised part of the lighter.
The aluminum alloy body is 7.8 inches long and weighs 1.2 ounces, long enough to reach into a jar candle without tipping it and light enough to leave in a drawer. The metal shell helps it shed heat after use. Quality and appearance score well; durability is where it falls short.
Two of the eight owner reviews we read mention it. All of them gave the product four or five stars. Score 93: we started at 88 and added 5 because the owner reviews that mention it are positive.
Six of the eight owner reviews we read mention it. All of them gave the product four or five stars. Score 93: we started at 88 and added 5 because the owner reviews that mention it are positive.
Seven of the eight owner reviews we read mention it, and those owners gave the product four or five stars, so the complaints come from the wider group of buyers. None of the reviews we read say what goes wrong, so this score rests on the buyer ratings. 15% of all ratings are three stars or fewer, which is where complaints like this usually sit. Score 82: we started at 88 and took off 6 because opi…
Seven of the eight owner reviews we read mention it, and those owners gave the product four or five stars, so the complaints come from the wider group of buyers. None of the reviews we read say what goes wrong, so this score rests on the buyer ratings. 15% of all ratings are three stars or fewer, which is where complaints like this usually sit. Score 82: we started at 88 and took off 6 because opinion is split.
Six of the eight owner reviews we read mention it, and those owners gave the product four or five stars, so the complaints come from the wider group of buyers. None of the reviews we read say what goes wrong, so this score rests on the buyer ratings. 15% of all ratings are three stars or fewer, which is where complaints like this usually sit. Score 76: we started at 88 and took off 12 because it d…
Six of the eight owner reviews we read mention it, and those owners gave the product four or five stars, so the complaints come from the wider group of buyers. None of the reviews we read say what goes wrong, so this score rests on the buyer ratings. 15% of all ratings are three stars or fewer, which is where complaints like this usually sit. Score 76: we started at 88 and took off 12 because it draws mostly complaints.
One of the eight owner reviews we read mentions it, and that owner gave the product four or five stars, so the complaints come from the wider group of buyers. None of the reviews we read say what goes wrong, so this score rests on the buyer ratings. 15% of all ratings are three stars or fewer, which is where complaints like this usually sit. Score 76: we started at 88 and took off 12 because it dr…
One of the eight owner reviews we read mentions it, and that owner gave the product four or five stars, so the complaints come from the wider group of buyers. None of the reviews we read say what goes wrong, so this score rests on the buyer ratings. 15% of all ratings are three stars or fewer, which is where complaints like this usually sit. Score 76: we started at 88 and took off 12 because it draws mostly complaints.
Three of the eight owner reviews we read mention it, and those owners gave the product four or five stars, so the complaints come from the wider group of buyers. None of the reviews we read say what goes wrong, so this score rests on the buyer ratings. 15% of all ratings are three stars or fewer, which is where complaints like this usually sit. Score 76: we started at 88 and took off 12 because it…
Three of the eight owner reviews we read mention it, and those owners gave the product four or five stars, so the complaints come from the wider group of buyers. None of the reviews we read say what goes wrong, so this score rests on the buyer ratings. 15% of all ratings are three stars or fewer, which is where complaints like this usually sit. Score 76: we started at 88 and took off 12 because it draws mostly complaints.
74% of ratings are five stars and 11% are four. 5% are three stars and 10% are one or two. The spread skews positive, but enough ratings sit low that the drawbacks below are worth reading. Score 88: its 4.4 star average on a 100 point scale.
Quality and ease of use draw the most praise, along with its sleek look and the convenience of recharging over USB instead of buying disposables. Battery life splits opinion: some find a charge lasts weeks, others find it drains faster than expected. Charging, reliability and durability all draw more complaints than praise, with some units failing within weeks or a few months.
Based on 20,589 Amazon customer ratings, averaging 4.4 out of 5, recorded 27 September 2026. See the reviews on Amazon
| 5 stars | 74% | |
|---|---|---|
| 4 stars | 11% | |
| 3 stars | 5% | |
| 2 stars | 3% | |
| 1 stars | 7% |
I've had one of these for a few months now at least. As mentioned in the review title, it's literally just a straight upgrade to a traditional lighter with no downsides I can see so far. One… Read it on AmazonBrad · December 18, 2023 · Verified
I’m really happy with the FUKKUDA Electric Candle Lighter. It’s much more convenient than using traditional lighters, and I really like the safety switch, which gives me extra peace of mind … Read it on AmazonLuis M. Espinal · September 6, 2026 · Verified
Saw this gadget at a friend’s house and ordered it immediately!! It arrived quickly and worked as advertised! I love lighting candles with this thing. It brings me such joy. I know how silly… Read it on AmazonAmazon Customer 22 · September 4, 2026 · Verified
I really liked this lighter. It’s very easy to use, lights quickly, and I love that it’s rechargeable, so I don’t have to keep buying new lighters. I’ve used it to light candles and it works… Read it on AmazonElaine Zulueta · August 17, 2026 · Verified
This electric lighter is super light-weight and durable. I have not had to charge it yet since I took it out of the package, so it lasts a long time. It is super easy to light chandles with,… Read it on AmazonLyn Couch · September 12, 2026 · Verified
Easy to use, and sleek, lightweight.Lisette · September 17, 2026 · Verified
Connect it to a USB power source and charge until the indicator lights show full before first use.
Move the safety switch to uncover the ignition button.
Hold the ignition button to start the arc; a buzzing sound is normal.
Place the arc against the wick for a moment until it catches. The arc switches off after 7 seconds.
Return the switch over the button before putting the lighter away.
A rechargeable battery drives a high-voltage arc between two contacts. The arc is hot enough to light a wick on contact, with no flame or fuel.
A safety switch covers the ignition button to prevent accidental firing, and the arc turns off automatically after 7 seconds. FUKKUDA warns never to touch the arc.
Over USB, from a computer, power bank or adapter. Indicator lights show how much charge remains.
Yes. With no flame to blow out, the arc keeps working in a draft.
A zee-zee sound during ignition is the normal sound of the arc and not a fault.
It varies. Many units keep working, but charging and durability draw more complaints than praise, and some fail within weeks or a few months, so keep the purchase details.
I Tested a FUKKUDA Plasma Lighter and Got SHOCKING Results!
Trevor Tried It
The Candle Lighter That Runs on Lightning. Just Recharge (FUKKUDA Electric Arc Candle Lighter with S
fitCPAandBeyond
FUKKUDA Electric Arc Candle Lighter with Safety Switch - USB RechargeableIs It Worth It? #amazon #ad
Amazon Rob
ELECTRIC CANDLE LIGHTER REVIEW // Fukkuda Rechargeable Windproof Flameless Lighter
Chef Media Group
Detailed Review of FUKKUDA Electric Candle Lighter
Kaderade Reviews
Demonstrating HOW WELL this Fukkuda Electric Candle Lighter from Amazon works [PRODUCT REVIEW]
Ricky Robert
FUKKUDA's electric lighter makes lighting candles pleasantly simple: one press, a windproof dual arc, no butane to buy, and a body long enough to reach into jar candles. Its safety design is well judged, with a switch that guards the ignition button and an arc that shuts off after 7 seconds. Quality, ease of use and looks are its most praised themes. The problem is staying power. Charging is the most criticised theme, reliability and durability draw more complaints than praise, and battery life is mixed, so some units last for ages while others fail within weeks. It is worth buying as an inexpensive convenience, as long as you keep the receipt and do not expect it to last forever.
A handy, safe-feeling candle lighter for the price, with a real chance you will be replacing it sooner than you would like.
Check price on Amazon
